The title of the study tells us that proving carcinogenicity was not seralini s intent, it was a long term toxicity study. The study by french scientist gilleseric seralini immediately hit the. The lucifer effect understanding how good people turn evil. Seralini released a book and film promoting his findings on the day the article appeared, and he and his supporters launched a massive worldwide public relations effort the same day. Plaintiffs exhibit monsanto and croplife emails re seralini study retraction. Pdf the readers cognitive response toward two problematic. Therefore, the tumor incidence and mortality results were reported, according to oecd guidelines for chronic toxicity studies 6, as secondary observations requiring followup using a study design intended to systematically assess carcinogenesis. In the present study we address the hypothesis that. John fagan1, terje traavik 2,3 and thomas bohn2 abstract a paper reporting findings relevant to safety of the genetically modified gm maize nk603 and the herbicide roundup seralini et al. The criticisms rely on a misrepresentation of the study that it was a flawed carcinogenicity cancer study. An evidencebased examination of the claims made for the safety. As with any scientific study, discussion, debate, and further study are necessary. But scientists understand that if the design, execution, or analysis of a study is fundamentally flawed, any conclusions are disqualified.
Dec 06, 20 the study, published in 2012 by the journal food and chemical toxicology fct 1, was by no means the first, nor the only one to show adverse health impacts from gm feed or roundup herbicide see 2 gm cancer warning can no longer be ignored, sis 56. Lessons from the seralini gm maize feeding study perform. Nov 30, 20 the organic prepper website is a participant in the amazon services llc associates program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to. Ethics debate intensifies over retraction of flawed seralini. Friedman, and jianming ye a bout 1,800 years ago, there was a discussion regarding establishing the legal volume of an egg, given that different eggs have different volumes. Discredited seralini gmo study back in spotlight as hastings. Inconclusive studies are published all the time, thats as it should be. The seralini study was released the same week in 2012 that he launched a promotional campaign for his book titled tous cobayes. He is also marketing a book and a documentary on the. Seralini study threatens monsanto money corrupts science.
Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats. Aug 29, 2015 the study was designed as a toxicological study, not as a carcinogenesis study. Jan 16, 2014 the seralini study was released the same week in 2012 that he launched a promotional campaign for his book titled tous cobayes. There are many fundamental flaws in the argumentation they are putting. Prejeans study lasted 6 months less than seralini s but they got more tumors. Jun 24, 2014 the new rat corn study by gilleseric seralini looks a lot like the old retracted one, according to a detailed analysis by the genetic literacy project. While seralini and his group suggest their findings show that safety studies are unsound, experts and industry have been quick to dismiss the methods used by the group as flawed themselves. He had published about 300 scientific papers, including two in nature, and published two books. There is no question that the publication of seralini s latest attack on genetically engineered foods was a wellplanned and cleverly orchestrated media event. Describe at least two ways stalin uses logical fallacies or other forms of faulty argumentation. The claim here is that seralini s study was tweeted and blogged 1.
An illusory consensus behind gmo health assessment jstor. What are we to make of the seralini studies claiming gmos. Seralini wins landmark gmo study defamation lawsuit. Mezzomo, immediately found another publisher in the journal of hematology and thrombosis disorders. He has discovered major hidden toxicities for these products. A scientific study that identified serious health impacts on rats fed on roundup ready gmo maize has been republished following its controversial retraction under strong commercial pressure. Since 1991, seralini has worked as a professor and researcher at the university of caen. Professor gilleseric seralini is an international researcher working on the effects of pollutants on health, especially gmos and pesticides.
Find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. But the study is currently available to read for free, and you can see a youtube clip of him discussing this paper, his methods, and his criticisms of monsanto. Ethics debate intensifies over retraction of flawed. A detailed critical analysis of the raw data of this subchronic 90day rat feeding study revealed statistically sig. The probability that seralini et als results are significant is sufficient to justify further study. The recent commentary in nature has demonstrated how. Thats what steven druker did in his selfpublished book altered genes, twisted truth. Seralini claims that his is the only longterm safety study conducted usi. The seralini gmo rat study is now infamous for its poor quality and overstated conclusions.
Since september 19, approximately 80 articles, interviews, and opposite the editorial pages have been published in frances general press related to this study france takes tough position on ge crops based on flawed study, 2012. Seralini also released a book and documentary film about the study in. Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats is republished. An illusory consensus behind gmo health assessment sheldon. It was immediately embraced by antigmo activists, and continues to be often cited as evidence that gmo foods are unhealthy. Some scholars argued that the study was scientifically flawed and that the findings were not valid efsa 2012. At this time, the results suggested effects on the liver and kidneys, organs of detoxification of the body, as well as biochemical disturbances in rats according to the gender.
The seralini study used 10 for each grouping, but they tested urine and serum samples from all 10. The seralini paper was published in november 2012 in food and chemical toxicology. If anyone still doubts the quality of this study, they should simply read the republished paper. Seralini study fuelling fear of frankenfood retracted. A comparison of the effects of three gm corn varieties on.
The ethics of the seralini retraction and charges of conflict. Seralini s contemporaries who criticized study sincerely dispute the results. In january 2014, the journal retracted the article without the authors consent on the grounds that the research was inconclusive. A novel food or food product must pass comprehensive lab and sometimes. The seralini study an attack on independent research. Although the act of retracting flawed articles helps purge the scientific literature of erroneous or unethical research, citations to such research. Part one january 14, 2014 writing for the hasting centers bioethic forum blog, adriane fughberman and thomas g. Gilleseric seralini born 23 august 1960 is a french molecular biologist, political advisor and. New seralini study questions legitimacy of gm safety data. Throughout the book tour, seralini did not portray the study as inconclusive. After seralini published his 2012 corn study in parallel with a book and a documentary called tous cobayes. The second edition of gmo myths and truths, coauthored by genetic engineers dr john fagan and dr michael antoniou and researcher claire robinson, was released on 19 may 2014 as a free online download by the sustainability and science policy platform earth open source. Reactions to republication of landmark seralini gmo study. When you have small sample size like in seralini s study, the effect of chance is.
Seralinis flawed results have been automatically accused of corporate. He exploits misinformation found in a limited selection of cherrypicked studies as the foundation for his unsubstantiated claims intended to scare people away from gmos and big ag. Cisgenesis shares many of the risks associated with transgenic genetic. Dirty details behind the attacks on seralinis notorious gmo. Over the years he has written about a hundred scientific articles and conference papers. September 26, 2012 on september 19, 2012, a team of independent scientists. Controversial seralini study linking gm to cancer in rats is. In light of these concerns regarding the study, it would be an enormous stretch to say the study proves that these corn varieties cause organ damage in mammals. First published by food and chemical toxicology in september 2012, the article presented a twoyear feeding study in rats, and reported an increase in tumors among rats fed genetically modified corn and the herbicide roundup. Dec 11, 20 the monsanto study, hayes says, included 20 rats per sex per group, whereas seralini et al only included 10 rats per sex per group. Seralini calls for retraction of biased eu study on gm maize. According to the head of the study though, professor gilleseric seralini, they used the exact same rats and the exact same numbers that monsanto used to get authorization for its maize. But what hayes fails to acknowledge is that the monsanto study only analysed 10 rats per group i. The seralini gmo study retraction and response to critics.
The seralini affair and beyond compiled by rosemary mason mb chb frca on behalf of a global network of independent scientists, beekeepers and environmentalists prof gilleseric seralini and colleagues at criigen in caen had questioned the adequacy of monsantos testing both for glyphosate and gm crops 1 the 90daylong tests are insufficient to evaluate chronic. None of the papers was considered as flawed by the scientific community. The design of the 2year chronic toxicity study in rodents allowed more time to study the development of the first signs of liver. Dec 01, 2020 future work on pesticide toxicity for regulatory assessments should include the study of full commercial formulations including declared and undeclared ingredients. Professor gileseric seralini, the researcher behind the now infamous study linking consumption of monsantos nk603 gm maize and its associated herbicide roundup to long term toxicity and cancer in rats recently said the decision to retract the study was based on unscientific double standards. Basic comparison the following is a simple comparison of the new independent study seralini et al. Defenders of the republication cite the virtue of access to data, and open communication, while decrying the censorship of the retraction. The study needs replicating by a truly independent laboratory using appropriate sample sizes. Our study was designed as a chronic toxicity study and as a direct followup to a previous investigation on the same nk603 gm maize conducted by the developer company, monsanto 3. Both participants in the discussion assumed the ideal measurement was to take the average of the largest. Scientists smell a rat in fraudulent seralini gmo study. Le nouvel observateur headline also had an influence here in the united states. The essential flaws in the study by seralini et al have been effectively highlighted. It was also immediately skewered by skeptics and more objective scientists as a fatally flawed study.
He claimed first in a letter addressed to the editorinchief that the publication of our study does not meet minimal acceptable standards of scientific rigor and will damage an entire scientific discipline due to flawed conclusion. The flawed science of the study has been universally rejected and should not be admitted into evidence the study is unreliable and not a proper part of any scientific evaluation of whether glyphosatebased herbicides can cause cancer. If critics claim seralinis well known study is flawed for. Retracting seralini study violates science and ethics. Oct 06, 20 professor anthony trewavass letter regarding prof ge seralini s study, which found that a monsanto gm maize and tiny amounts of the roundup herbicide it is grown with caused serious health effects in rats, misrepresents the study as well as oecd guidelines on safety studies flawed study fails to prove harm, letters, september 29. Lobbies have defamed him several times, he won seven times in court when he attacked them from 2011 to 2017. Commenting on the study finding, dr carl winter, cooperative extension food toxicologist at university of california, davis warned that the study s. The two other types of gm maize studied produce two different new. Cisgenesis is a safe form of gm because no foreign genes are involved truth. Dirty details behind the attacks on seralinis notorious. Jan 15, 2014 the seralini study was released the same week in 2012 that he launched a promotional campaign for his book titled tous cobayes. Numerous letters to the editor were submitted to the journal in support of and in opposition to the study, although most were negative. Genetically modified crops and foods are neither safe nor necessary to feed the world, a new report by genetic engineers shows.
Aug 01, 2015 shortly after this study was published, numerous scientists and several scientific organizations criticized the research as methodologically and ethically flawed. Pdf a paper reporting findings relevant to safety of the genetically. In fact it was a longterm chronic toxicity study, as is made clear in the title and introduction. Therefore, all these three gm maize contain novel pesticide residues that.
Professor seralini was the main investigator and supervised the work. The vehemence of the critics is not matched by their evidence. The seralini affair was the controversy surrounding the publication, retraction, and. The seralini study is the most detailed and thorough study ever done on a gm food and its associated. After seralini published his 2012 corn study in parallel with a book and a. Jun 24, 2014 the study was and, i believe, remains flawed. The bulletin criticizes the science behind the study, questions the ethics of the study s authors and the standards of the.
Zombie retracted seralini gmo maize rat study republished to. The republication of the paper extends the saga, but does nothing to correct the many failings of the study. Did journal editor read the seralini paper before retracting it. None of this reflected well on a journal that obviously should never have published this paper in the first place.
Seralini et al found that a gm maize and its associated herbicide roundup resulted in numerous chronic abnormalities in rats. Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human. The seralini study 2012 included only 10 ratssexgroup, and this low number is inadequate to make meaningful comparisons in tumor incidence between groups at the end of a chronic study especially when one considers that older female sd rats are known to have high spontaneous rates of mammary and pituitary tumors efsa, 2012. Gmo myths and truths 2nd edition earth open source. However, the bfr concluded that the studies in question have certain flaws and do.
1082 1690 1051 1428 128 1177 12 747 1748 770 1268 646 688 236 1327 655 1150 1031 1496 1707 206 1709 991 995 842 521 957 229 957 1684 1286 1634 1674